The Parent at the heart of the Infant’s Sensory flow
Lindsay Hardy & Emily Hills • Sensory Beginnings Ltd • www.sensorybeginnings.com
WAIMH World Congress, Toronto, October 2026
Parenting is crafting, weaving, creating a living sensory ecosystem for their child. From the moment of conception through the first 1,000 days, early relational health and infant development are shaped in the quiet, moment-to-moment sensory exchanges between infants and caregivers. While clinical practice often focuses heavily on observable behaviours, the continuous sensory processes humming between infant and parent and within the everyday caregiving occupations, are largely unobserved and therefore unaddressed.
The Sensory Beginnings Model places sensation at the centre of early parenting. The model highlights three interwoven rhythms that sit within the model;
Regulation: My regulation rhythm – how I am feeling.
Relationships: My sphere ofconnection, where I share my regulation rhythm with others, what am I offering? What do I need?
Occupations: My everyday patterns of doing: sleeping, playing, dressing, eating, learning, working and resting, and especially parenting.
These three rhythms are always interacting.
When one rhythm becomes challenged, the others are affected.
We also use each rhythm to stabilise and support the others.
At the heart of the model is our Sensory Flow. Sensations are at the heart of everything we feel and everything we do, how we connect, regulate our states, how we learn, how we love.
Sensory Flow is the total, living ecosystem of input, processing, and output, the continuous lifecycle of sensory energy.
We are all sensory transceivers, constantly transmitting and receiving sensory signals to, from and with each other. It connects us to everything. To each other, physical spaces, nature, and our own internal organs.
Sensations are the neurochemical currency of human development, the language of regulation and connection. The constant stream that flows towards us, through us and within us are formative – informing us, scaffolding and moulding our neurobiology, building our future functional capacity and stimulus reactivity.
Nothing shapes an infants’ developing brain and body more than the proximal sensory matrix, that is, the sensory ecosystem a parent creates around them.
From the enveloping landscape of the womb to the ever-extending wider world, parents act as a primary sensory provider and filter. A parent’s own regulation state and occupational capacity directly dictate the quality, quantity, and somatic attunement of the sensations they offer.
When a parent cannot build or sustain this ecosystem due to burnout, overload or trauma, the ecosystem diminishes, and the child’s sensory world becomes less attuned. Where this sensory ecosystem is rich and responsive, lifelong resilience grows.
Relationships happen when the sending and receiving of sensory signals becomes an attuned, fluid dance, binding together the biological systems of parent and infant. They come to know each other not through words, but through the senses: touch, sound, smell, gaze and the synchronized, shared rhythms of movement (proprioception and vestibular processing), a recognition of interoceptive need.
This continuous, reciprocal loop, namely the infant transmits a sensory signal (a cry, a gaze shift, a change in muscle tone) and the parent receives, reads and responds, sending back sensory signals of safeness and guidance. These close sensory dances trigger joint oxytocin surges, sparking shared pleasure and physical attunement. This attunement is now measurable as noted, mothers and infants coordinate heart rhythms aligned to within one second (Feldman et al., 2011), and their brainwaves synchronised during responsive exchange (Liu et al., 2024). Being read and responded is how relationship is sensed from the inside. When a parent is unavailable to transceive these signals, relationship building is challenged, the vital sensory bridge to wellbeing and resilience is compromised.
Sensations regulate our brain, body, and behaviour. An infant’s self-regulation, their future capacity to hold a stable internal state and self-soothe, is built on the foundations of co-regulation, arising from nurturing sensory exchanges.
A parent’s own regulation state determines their capacity to access their Caregiving Brain Network, the neurobiological ability to notice need, feel motivated to care and respond with thoughtful action and attuned sensory responses.
Availability of the Caregiving Brain is state-dependent. In a comfortable, regulated state, a parent can connect, think clearly and accurately read their infant’s behavioural cues to deliver the sensory experience that will resolve stress. Under distress or shutdown, this access narrows through the brain’s own protection mechanisms. Parenting stress measurably reduces parent-infant brainwave synchrony. (Azhari et al., 2019–2021). The parent’s regulation is the ultimate precondition for attunement, casting a long sensory reach that shapes interbrain networks detectable well into the child’s adolescence (Schwartz et al., 2024).
Occupations are active biological regulators. When parent and child are successfully engaged in shared “co-occupations,” they step into a bi-directional loop of occupational regulation that creates a profound sense of safety and occupational self-efficacy.
Caregiving occupations, the daily rhythms of feeding, bathing, settling, holding and play are more than tasks. They are thousands of sensory micro-moments through which autonomic regulation occurs, relationships are constructed and experience-dependent neuroplasticity capacity is realised. Infants are completely dependent on caregivers for physiological survival; it is through these caregiving occupations that physiological and psychosocial connection is constructed (Fotopoulou & Tsakiris, 2017).
Through these everyday rituals, a parent weaves sensory threads creating an embodied sense of safeness and competence, giving the child the anchor they need to eventually step out into the wider world.
Co-Regulation (The Union of Regulation + Relationship) The dynamic process where two autonomic nervous systems interact through shared emotional and sensory tuning to catch and mirror each other’s regulation rhythms.
Co-Occupation (The Union of Relationship + Occupation) An interactive caregiving activity explicitly shared between parent and child, where everyday tasks become meaningful sensory rituals that physically bind the relationship together.
Occupational Homeostasis (The Union of Occupation + Regulation) The intentional use of structured daily activities and caregiving routines as active neurological tools to modulate and balance the body’s internal biological systems.
When we look at an infant and a caregiver, we are looking at a living, breathing sensory ecosystem in motion. The three rhythms of Regulation, Relationship and Occupation are not separate clinical pillars; they are the interwoven threads of a single tapestry, continuously fuelled by the sensory currency that flows between two nervous systems within a constructed sensory ecosystem.
There is quite literally nothing that is not sensory. But because this neuro-sensory dialogue hums largely unseen, and therefore unlauded, the sensory ecosystem, arising from essential caregiving occupations of early parenthood, is frequently undervalued.
Put on your sensory glasses and a cuddle, a nappy change, a slow feed, a rhythmic rock is never just a task. The parents, as the primary sensory being, uses their own body as a biological tuning fork, entraining the infant’s fragile, developing rhythms. When a parent holds a distressed baby close, their heartbeat, the warmth of their skin, the pitch of their voice, the rise and fall of their chest are actively pulling the infant’s nervous system into synchronisation. A parent feeding their baby at 3am is not merely executing a chore; they are operating as a biological transceiver, transmitting safety, regulating blood glucose, weaving neural pathways.
The sensations that stream between parent and child during a bath, a midnight feed, a quiet gaze do not disappear when the moment ends. They are literal building blocks of neurobiology, laying down a biological blueprint of resilience, shaping interbrain networks the child will carry quietly into adolescence and beyond.
If we can help parents and practitioners see this invisible language, we change how early care is valued. These everyday acts cease to be menial. They are claimed for what they are: profound, irreplaceable acts of neurological creation.
· Azhari, A., Leck, W.Q., Gabrieli, G., Bizzego, A., Rigo, P., Setoh, P., Bornstein, M.H. and Esposito, G. (2019) ‘Parenting stress undermines mother-child brain-to-brain synchrony’, Scientific Reports, 9(1), p. 11407. Nature
· Davis, J. and Lovegrove, E. (2019) ‘Understanding occupational therapy perinatal mental health practice’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(12), pp. 719-721.
· Dunn, W. (2007) ‘Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge’, Infants & Young Children, 20(2), pp. 84-101.
· Feldman, R., Magori-Cohen, R., Galili, G., Singer, M. and Louzoun, Y. (2011) ‘Mother and infant coordinate heart rhythms through episodes of interaction synchrony’, Infant Behavior and Development, 34(4), pp. 569–577.
· Fotopoulou, A. and Tsakiris, M. (2017) ‘Mentalizing homeostasis: the social origins of interoceptive inference’, Neuropsychoanalysis, 19(1), pp. 3–28.
· Lim, Y.H., Honey, A., Du Toit, S. and McGrath, M. (2022) ‘The parenting occupations and purposes conceptual framework: A scoping review of “doing” parenting’, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 69(1), pp. 89-106. PubMed
· Liu, S., Han, Z.R., Xu, J., Wang, Q., Gao, M.M., Weng, X., Qin, S. and Rubin, K.H. (2024) ‘Parenting links to parent–child interbrain synchrony: a real-time fNIRS hyperscanning study’, Cerebral Cortex, 34(2), p. bhad533. APA PsycNet
· McGrath, M., Almomani, F., Chen, Y., Codd, Y., Ahn, J., Kunishige, M., Morrison, R., O’Mara, V., Peterson, J., Pituch, E., Rider, J., Romli, M., Rozen, D., Sabbah, R., Sarsak, H., Saunders, E., Sim, S., Tan, H.L., Wong, W.T., Wan Yunus, F. and Honey, A. (2025) ‘Supporting parents with disability and other challenges through occupational therapy: What is needed?’, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 72(3), e70026. PMC
· Perry, B.D. and Pollard, R. (1998) ‘Homeostasis, stress, trauma, and adaptation: a neurodevelopmental view of childhood trauma’, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 7(1), pp. 33–51.
Pickens, N.D. and Pizur-Barnekow, K. (2009) ‘Co-occupation: Extending the understanding of a concept’, Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), pp. 151-156.
· Porges, S.W. and Furman, S.A. (2011) ‘The early development of the autonomic nervous system provides a neural platform for social behaviour’, Infant and Child Development, 20(1), pp. 106–118.
· Schwartz, L., Hayut, O., Levy, J., Gordon, I. and Feldman, R. (2024) ‘Sensitive infant care tunes a frontotemporal interbrain network in adolescence’, Scientific Reports, 14(1), p. 22602. Nature
Sign up today to receive your free copy of ‘Sensory Wellbeing’. Full of sensory strategies for self care when working in a stressful environment.
You’ll also get the latest sensory news, information and updates straight to your inbox every month.
English (UK) 
Español 